The collapse of the Infinity Q mutual fund is a warning to investors (2024)

Marshall Glickman is a careful investor who says he works too hard to take chances with his nest egg.

Back in 2016, his research identified the Infinity Q mutual fund as a holding that could do well even if the stock market didn't. He slowly built up his stake in the fund, watching its performance, and felt comfortable enough to place 30 percent of his substantial savings into the fund.

"I spoke to management multiple times, including people at the fund who told me they had all their net worth in it," Glickman said. "These guys had an incredible pedigree. This looked like a total A-team."

Now, Glickman's investment in the fund is frozen amid questions about how its manager valued a large swath of its assets. Facing a substantial loss, Glickman, owner of an online bookseller in Vermont, is experiencing that bull market rarity — a mutual fund collapse.

The collapse of the Infinity Q mutual fund is a warning to investors (1)

The fall of the almost $2 billion Infinity Q Diversified Alpha Fund is a reminder to investors about the risks that can lurk in their holdings and the heavy costs and frustrations that liquidating funds bring. Glickman, for one, is especially upset that the fund's trustees have set aside $750 million of investors' money to cover potential costs associated with lawsuits against the fund and its officials.

At least one expert said he is not surprised that the Infinity Q flop involved a portfolio loaded with exotic and hard-to-value investments. In recent years, some mutual funds have increased their stakes in such instruments, posing significant risks to investors. Infinity Q's holdings included complex bets on interest rates, commodities, currencies and corporate defaults.

"There are few things as important to investors as knowing the value of what they own, and the [Securities and Exchange Commission] has rules designed to ensure that funds accurately reflect the real values of their financial instruments," said Tyler Gellasch, executive director of Healthy Markets, a nonprofit organization that promotes best practices in capital markets. "Unfortunately, less than a year ago, the SEC fundamentally weakened those rules."

The rules were changed in the waning weeks of the Trump administration. One let fund managers increase their exposure to the riskier investments favored by Infinity Q, and the other allowed for relaxed oversight of mutual fund boards when valuing those arcane investments.

There is no evidence that the rule changes triggered Infinity Q's valuation issues.

The Infinity Q mutual fund began operations in 2014, aiming to generate returns that did not move in tandem with the overall stock and bond markets. It had A-list connections: A major investor in the fund's manager was the family of David Bonderman, the billionaire co-founder of TPG Capital, a mammoth private-equity firm that may soon sell shares to the public for the first time.

The Bonderman ties were a selling point for Infinity Q; a presentation from last September boasted that its investors would gain access to the same "alternative investment strategies originally created" for the prosperous family.

The strategies involved bets on esoteric instruments broadly known as derivatives, because they're derived from other securities. The chief investment officer, James Velissaris, worked for the Bonderman family before he co-founded Infinity Q Capital Management.

Infinity Q said its analysis was "grounded in economic intuition" and "in-depth private-equity style due diligence." As of last September, the strategy had generated annual returns of 9.5 percent since inception, according to a document from the presentation.

All appeared to be fine until late February, when investors were suddenly unable to redeem shares in the fund. In allowing the fund to bar redemptions, the SEC reported that the fund had claimed that Velissaris, Infinity Q's top manager, had been "adjusting" independent pricing models used to assess 18 percent of the fund's assets and that those values could not be verified.

Velissaris stepped down from the fund, which began liquidating amid a government inquiry. The difference between what its holdings had been valued at and what they fetched when sold was about $500 million; $1.2 billion in cash remained.

An Infinity Q Capital Management spokesman said the Bonderman family was a passive investor in the firm and had no control over its investments. The family lost "a substantial amount" in the collapse, he added, and will be "treated exactly as every other investor in the plan of distribution."

Mark Schonfeld, a lawyer at Gibson Dunn who represents Velissaris, said in a statement that Velissaris "always acted in good faith with commonly used approaches to value complicated derivatives and determine that fund positions were fairly valued in accordance with the disclosed procedures." Schonfeld added that Velissaris has not been involved in the liquidation of the fund, which has resulted in sales of "complex positions at distressed prices."

Six months after the problems arose, the fund's overseers, known as trustees, are still trying to figure out the extent of the improperly valued positions and when the practices began. They have hired an outside valuation consultant to analyze the fund's portfolio and warned that investors may have to wait over a year to get final payouts after all its obligations have been met.

In the meantime, investors are being charged fees for the fund's wind-down. On Aug. 23, the fund's trustees told investors that Infinity Q Capital Management had not responded to demands that it pay the liquidation costs rather than investors, as required under its contract. The firm's spokesman said it "has not received an accounting or a request for the payment" from the trustees "for any specific amounts related to the liquidation."

As investors in the fund's investment adviser, Infinity Q Capital Management, the Bonderman family stood to receive profits from its operation, the spokesman confirmed. "They have agreed to return those distributions to the fund to help pay the expenses of the liquidation," he said.

The collapse of the Infinity Q mutual fund is a warning to investors (2)

The trustees are also withholding $750 million in investors' money to cover potential costs of lawsuits filed against them and the fund as a result of the mess. That is necessary, they say, because insurance held to cover lawsuit costs may be insufficient, and it does not cover certain expenses, including those associated with the liquidation and government investigations.

That angers Glickman, the investor. He questioned why those who have already been hurt should also have to absorb legal costs for the fund and its officials.

"It's maddening," Glickman said.

'Detriment of retail investors'

Right now, the fund trustees' distribution plan, proposed in early June, awaits approval by the SEC. Glickman hopes it will make the trustees design a fairer plan for investors.

The SEC declined to comment.

Many holders are retail investors; accounts at Charles Schwab held 52 percent of the mutual fund's shares, according to an SEC filing from a year ago. Unlucky institutions were also investors. The State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio, a $95 billion fund, held a $53 million investment in an Infinity Q hedge fund as of January, its spokesman said by email.

Rudy Fichtenbaum, a newly elected trustee of the Ohio teachers' pension fund, said it appears to have lost $22 million in Infinity Q. "The problem with these illiquid private investments is the opaqueness which removes pension boards from exercising the appropriate level of oversight," he said. "I don't know who's equipped to vet these things, but I don't think these kinds of investments are where pensions want to be."

The Infinity Q mutual fund prospectus did note that not all risks "can be identified nor can controls be developed to eliminate or mitigate their occurrence or effects." As a result, "the fund's ability to manage risk is subject to substantial limitations."

Esoteric and hard-to-value investments in mutual funds like Infinity Q have been on the regulatory radar for years. In 2015, the SEC proposed rules to limit the investments mutual funds could make using complex derivatives; the proposal was not adopted.

Then, late last year, the SEC implemented the rule that let mutual fund managers expand their exposures to risky derivatives and another that let independent fund overseers, on hand to protect investors, delegate valuation of the complex instruments to others, including to the fund's investment adviser overseeing the portfolio.

The SEC declined to comment on the rule changes. But the rule involving derivatives drew a long dissent from Allison Herren Lee, an SEC commissioner, who said it increased risk and reduced transparency, "all to the detriment of retail investors."

'Errors or misallocations'

Even before its recent woes, the Infinity Q fund had stumbled over valuations, securities filings show. In 2016, the fund was late with a regulatory filing because an independent pricing service had been unable to "support" some of its valuations. The stakes had to be revalued, the document said, but no reimbursem*nt to investors was necessary.

Infinity Q fund had a valuation committee overseen by its trustees, the fund's prospectus said. It reviewed the fund investment adviser's assessment of securities "for which current and reliable market quotations are not readily available."

After the 2016 incident, the fund's trustees noted that they had "worked closely" with Infinity Q Capital Management "to ensure that the appropriate source documentation for its valuation determinations are maintained, and the adviser's trade allocation oversight was enhanced to better identify any errors or misallocations."

Then, late last year, another valuation error occurred. It caused the fund to halt new investments as it corrected the mistake, the Infinity Q spokesman said.

Like those at other mutual funds, the Infinity Q fund's trustees oversaw its operation on behalf of investors. All are affiliated with a Milwaukee-based entity called Trust for Advised Portfolios, which oversees 30 other funds, securities filings show.

A lawyer who represents the trustees said they declined to comment or answer questions about their oversight.

Three of the trustees are considered independent overseers, regulatory filings say: John Chrystal, founder of a financial services consulting firm; the Rev. Albert DiUlio, treasurer of the Midwest Province and Wisconsin Province of the Society of Jesus; and Harry E. Resis, a private investor.

The four other trustees are not considered independent, because they work for U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, which receives revenues for custodian and other services provided to the fund. The fund's lead trustee, Christopher E. Kashmerick, a senior vice president of U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, declined to comment.

Investor lawsuits have been filed against the fund, its officials and the trustees who signed fund documents alleging that participants violated securities laws by making misrepresentations or omissions in the fund's filings and other statements.

Glickman, the investor, said the trustees should step aside from the liquidation of the fund because lawsuits accusing them of misconduct mean their interests and those of shareholders have diverged.

An additional challenge: The trustees say investors who sold their shares before the collapse may have gotten inflated values for their holdings. If so, the trustees may try to claw those back.

Over time, for example, the Bonderman family bought and sold "incremental" amounts of its Infinity Q fund holdings, the spokesman said. The redemptions were unrelated to the valuation concerns, he said, and were made to free up capital for other uses. The family's investments in the fund "far exceeded its redemptions," he said.

Gretchen Morgenson

Gretchen Morgenson is the senior financial reporter for the NBC News Investigative Unit.A former stockbroker, she won the Pulitzer Prize in 2002 for her "trenchant and incisive" reporting on Wall Street.

As someone deeply immersed in the world of finance and investment, I can attest to the intricate dynamics and potential pitfalls that investors navigate. My extensive experience in the field allows me to shed light on the nuances presented in the article about Marshall Glickman's unfortunate experience with the Infinity Q mutual fund.

Marshall Glickman's careful approach to investing, backed by thorough research in 2016, showcases the diligence required in the financial realm. His initial identification of the Infinity Q mutual fund as a potentially resilient holding, even in the face of market uncertainties, demonstrates a keen understanding of risk management.

The article underscores the complexities of the Infinity Q collapse, highlighting the fund's frozen assets and the questions surrounding its manager's valuation practices. This situation serves as a stark reminder to investors about the inherent risks in their portfolios and the challenges associated with liquidating funds.

The involvement of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the recent rule changes during the Trump administration further accentuates the evolving regulatory landscape. The modified rules allowed fund managers to increase exposure to riskier investments, a factor that, while not directly implicated in Infinity Q's issues, raises concerns about the broader implications for investor protection.

The article delves into the composition of Infinity Q's holdings, revealing a mix of exotic and hard-to-value investments, including bets on interest rates, commodities, currencies, and corporate defaults. The scrutiny by experts, such as Tyler Gellasch of Healthy Markets, on the importance of accurately reflecting the values of financial instruments underscores the critical role of regulatory frameworks in maintaining transparency and safeguarding investor interests.

The connection between Infinity Q and the Bonderman family, founders of TPG Capital, adds another layer to the narrative. The family's involvement as a major investor, coupled with the fund's promise of providing access to alternative investment strategies, reflects the influence of high-profile backers in shaping investor perceptions.

The resignation of James Velissaris, Infinity Q's chief investment officer, amid government inquiries and the subsequent liquidation process further exemplifies the challenges faced by investors when unforeseen issues arise. The valuation discrepancies, totaling $500 million, highlight the potential consequences of misjudgments in the valuation of complex financial instruments.

The ongoing uncertainty surrounding the extent of improperly valued positions and the fund's trustees' efforts to ascertain when the issues began underscore the prolonged and arduous nature of resolving such crises. The withholding of $750 million to cover potential legal costs amplifies investor frustrations and raises questions about the fairness of burdening affected investors with legal expenses.

In conclusion, the Infinity Q mutual fund collapse serves as a cautionary tale for investors, emphasizing the need for due diligence, regulatory scrutiny, and a deep understanding of the evolving financial landscape. The article's exploration of rule changes, valuation errors, and the intricate relationships within the fund's governance structure provides valuable insights into the challenges inherent in navigating the complex world of investments.

The collapse of the Infinity Q mutual fund is a warning to investors (2024)


The collapse of the Infinity Q mutual fund is a warning to investors? ›

The fall of the almost $2 billion Infinity Q Diversified Alpha Fund is a reminder to investors about the risks that can lurk in their holdings and the heavy costs and frustrations that liquidating funds bring.

What happens to my money if mutual fund is closed? ›

In the case of a Mutual Fund company shutting down, either the trustees of the fund have to approach SEBI for approval to close or SEBI by itself can direct a fund to shut. In such cases, all investors are returned their funds based on the last available net asset value, before winding up.

Why people are not investing in quant mutual funds? ›

We quant MF have been a very recent performer, the quant strategy a lot of people cannot align with their style of investing, have high churns, high cost . Thus a lot of influencers would avoid recommended investment in it. Hope that helps.

Why would a mutual fund be closed to new investors? ›

Mutual funds and hedge funds may choose to close to new investors for various reasons such as excessive inflows or to maintain exclusivity. Funds may also close to new investors due to poor performance when a fund is winding down.

What happens to mutual funds if the market crashes? ›

Due to this, mutual funds offer you the benefit of diversification. However, during a market crash, stock prices come down. This, in turn, pulls down the performance of mutual funds holding these stocks. Companies, too, face a tough time with their operations taking a hit, and it takes time for stocks to recover.

Can I get my money back from mutual fund? ›

When you withdraw funds from a mutual fund, you essentially redeem a certain number of units you own and receive their value. For instance, if you hold 10,000 units of a mutual fund scheme and each unit is priced at Rs. 10, you can opt to redeem a specific number of units or withdraw a certain amount in currency terms.

How do I get my money out of mutual funds? ›

You must complete and submit a withdrawal request form if you want to withdraw offline. The state would be given to the Asset Management Company by the broker. On the other hand, you may also redeem online if the broker provides a service online through a site or mobile app.

Can Quant mutual fund be trusted? ›

Like many other Quant funds, Quant Active Fund is also an outlier. Its offbeat investment style has made it a chart-topper. If you are interested in this fund, you can consider it. But given its limited history under the current fund managers, avoid going overboard on it.

Is Quant mutual fund trustworthy? ›

Are Quant Mutual Fund's schemes safe to invest in? One of the reputable AMCs in India is the Quant Mutual Fund. All mutual fund houses are subject to stringent SEBI regulation. But when it comes to market-linked products like mutual funds, no asset management firm can ensure the protection of capital.

Which company owns Quant mutual fund? ›

The Mutual Fund was registered with SEBI on June 11, 2018 under Registration Code MF/028/96/4. quant Mutual Fund is sponsored by quant Capital Finance & Investments Private Limited.

Should I get out of mutual funds now? ›

However, if you have noticed significantly poor performance over the last two or more years, it may be time to cut your losses and move on. To help your decision, compare the fund's performance to a suitable benchmark or to similar funds. Exceptionally poor comparative performance should be a signal to sell the fund.

Should I exit mutual funds now? ›

Market Volatility and Risk Management

If a fund consistently underperforms over multiple periods and fails to deliver satisfactory returns, consider exiting the investment. Research and select funds with a similar investment objective but better track records and performance history to redirect your investments.

What is the new rule for mutual fund investors? ›

According to the new rules, the cut-off time is no longer relevant for the purchase of mutual fund units, except for liquid and overnight funds. Instead, the NAV applicable for the purchase of mutual fund units will depend on the realization of funds, i.e., when the fund house receives the money from the investor.

When should you cash out a mutual fund? ›

You may want to sell a mutual fund if it is massively outperforming its benchmark. Other reasons to sell include "style drift," you need to rebalance your portfolio or your risk tolerance has changed. The final reason to sell mutual funds is if there are cheaper options available.

Should I keep investing in mutual funds during recession? ›

A far better strategy is to build a diversified mutual fund portfolio. A properly constructed portfolio, including a mix of both stock and bonds funds, provides an opportunity to participate in stock market growth and cushions your portfolio when the stock market is in decline.

When should you sell a bad mutual fund? ›

When your mutual fund has a significant capital loss, while other holdings incur capital gains, it might be time to sell. In such a case, if you sell the fund, you'll be able to secure a capital loss on your tax return. That loss can offset realized capital gains and ultimately lower your tax bill.

Can closed ended mutual funds lose value? ›

Typically, market risk results in greater fluctuations in the net asset value (NAV) when the remaining maturity of a portfolio security is longer. Equity Closed-End Funds: The vulnerability of seeing a decline in their NAV and market price is a shared risk among all equity closed-end funds.

What happens when close ended mutual fund matures? ›

At maturity, the scheme is dissolved, and the money is returned to the investors at the prevailing NAV (net asset value) on that date.

What are the disadvantages of closed ended mutual funds? ›

Cons of closed-end funds

A closed-end fund's liquidity depends on investor supply and demand, so it can be less liquid than an open-end fund. These funds are also subject to increased volatility because shares can trade above or below their NAV. Another potential drawback is that many closed-end funds use leverage.

How long do you keep money in a mutual fund? ›

Mutual funds have sales charges, and that can take a big bite out of your return in the short run. To mitigate the impact of these charges, an investment horizon of at least five years is ideal.


Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Ms. Lucile Johns

Last Updated:

Views: 5601

Rating: 4 / 5 (61 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Ms. Lucile Johns

Birthday: 1999-11-16

Address: Suite 237 56046 Walsh Coves, West Enid, VT 46557

Phone: +59115435987187

Job: Education Supervisor

Hobby: Genealogy, Stone skipping, Skydiving, Nordic skating, Couponing, Coloring, Gardening

Introduction: My name is Ms. Lucile Johns, I am a successful, friendly, friendly, homely, adventurous, handsome, delightful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.